Skip to content
Brussels Governance Monitor
Back to comparisons

Federal unemployment reform (2026): divergent regional responses

Recently verified · 7 Feb 2026

Regional response capacity to the 2026 federal unemployment reform

Brussels-Capital Region (BXL)Flemish Region (VLA)Walloon Region (WAL)
EntityValueDate
VLAVDAB emergency plan activated (enhanced support, additional budgets)15 January 2026
WALPartial Forem measures (targeted intensification, no additional budget)31 January 2026
BXLNo new measures — government in caretaker mode1 February 2026
VLARegional unemployment rate: ~3.2%31 December 2025
WALRegional unemployment rate: ~8.5%31 December 2025
BXLRegional unemployment rate: ~12.7%31 December 2025

Methodology

Comparison of measures announced or activated by each regional public employment service (VDAB, Forem, Actiris) in response to the federal unemployment reform taking effect in 2026. Information is drawn from official communications of employment services and regional parliamentary debates.

Comparability limitations

The federal unemployment reform is a federal competence; Regions are responsible for guidance and training of jobseekers. Regional unemployment rates are from Statbel using the ILO definition (International Labour Organisation). Figures are quarterly estimates, not exact monthly data.

Context

The federal government adopted an unemployment system reform in early 2026 aimed at limiting the duration of benefits and strengthening job search requirements. This reform has a direct impact on the Regions, which are responsible for the guidance and training of jobseekers through their public services (VDAB in Flanders, Forem in Wallonia, Actiris in Brussels).

Flanders: immediate activation

The VDAB, the Flemish public employment service, activated an emergency plan as soon as the reform was announced:

  • Enhanced individual support: increase in the number of counsellors assigned to long-term jobseeker follow-up
  • Additional budgets: the Flemish government released supplementary funds for training and retraining
  • Targeted programmes: launch of specific measures for the groups most affected by tightened conditions

The Flemish unemployment rate (~3.2%) allows for a relative absorption of the reform's effects, as the labour market is tight in many sectors.

Wallonia: partial response

The Forem intensified certain support actions but without additional budget:

  • Targeted intensification: reallocation of internal resources towards affected groups
  • No comprehensive emergency plan: the recently installed Walloon government prioritised other budget areas
  • Training: extension of certain existing programmes, without new schemes

The Walloon unemployment rate (~8.5%) is higher than in Flanders, making the regional population more vulnerable to the reform's effects.

Brussels: inability to act

Actiris, the Brussels employment service, cannot launch new measures:

  • Government in caretaker mode: no new policy can be decided
  • Budget on provisional twelfths: no additional resources available
  • Continuation of existing programmes only: Actiris continues its regular missions but without adaptation to the federal reform

The Brussels unemployment rate (~12.7%), the highest of the three Regions, makes this inability to act particularly concerning. Brussels concentrates a disproportionate share of long-term jobseekers who will be the first affected by tightened conditions.

The structural challenge

This situation highlights a specific risk of the Brussels institutional crisis: when a federal reform changes the environment, Regions with a fully empowered government can adapt. Brussels, in caretaker mode, cannot. Brussels jobseekers face both the federal tightening and the absence of a regional response.

Sources

  • VDAB, communication on the reinforced support plan (January 2026)
  • Forem, activity report fourth quarter 2025
  • Actiris, annual report 2025
  • Statbel, labour force survey, quarterly estimates Q4 2025
  • Chamber of Representatives, text of the unemployment reform (2026)